From ad4866e0cb1f7ddefbe1e31a890741e4cbc50181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aliaspider
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:47:04 +0100
Subject: remove unused files

---
 sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c | 47 --------------------------------
 1 file changed, 47 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c

(limited to 'sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c')

diff --git a/sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c b/sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c
deleted file mode 100755
index aa23fb3..0000000
--- a/sdk-modifications/libsrc/fs/fatfile_ex.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-#include <fcntl.h>
-#include <string.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <ctype.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-#include <iorpg.h>
-
-#include "cache.h"
-#include "file_allocation_table.h"
-#include "bit_ops.h"
-#include "filetime.h"
-#include "fatfile.h"
-
-// origin fread/fwrite do not take advantage of continuous read/write function of SD/NAND, 
-// it looks like the third parameter to _FAT_read_r()/_FAT_write_r() is a fixed '2'
-// so they are much slower than these two....
-
-// due to behavior of _FAT_read_r()/_FAT_write_r(), 
-// FAT should have a at least 8192 cluster size to get better performance, 
-// 16K or larger cluster size can get the best performance.
-
-
-
-int freadex( void * buffer, int _size, int _n, FILE * f )
-{
-	if( 0 == _n )
-		return 0;
-	dbg_printf("freadx %d\n", _n );
-	struct _reent r;
-	int ret = _FAT_read_r( &r, (int)f->_file + 8, buffer, _size * _n );
-	errno = r._errno;
-	return ret;
-}
-
-
-int fwriteex( const void * buffer, int _size, int _n, FILE * f )
-{
-	if( 0 == _n )
-		return 0;
-	dbg_printf("fwritex new %d\n", _n );
-	struct _reent r;
-	int ret = _FAT_write_r( &r, (int)f->_file + 8, buffer, _size * _n );
-	errno = r._errno;
-	return ret;
-}
-
-- 
cgit v1.2.3