From f385752705de73b04cbbda735a71f14c19e241a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nebuleon Fumika
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:33:30 -0500
Subject: memcpy vs memmove: memmove correctly handles overlapping source and
 destination memory buffers, but is slower than memcpy in many
 implementations. When memory buffers don't overlap, memcpy may be more
 efficient.

The DS2 SDK is such an implementation, so change many memmoves into memcpys.
---
 source/cheats2.cpp | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'source/cheats2.cpp')

diff --git a/source/cheats2.cpp b/source/cheats2.cpp
index e5a7b0f..59855b9 100644
--- a/source/cheats2.cpp
+++ b/source/cheats2.cpp
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ void S9xDeleteCheat (uint32 which1)
 	if (Cheat.c [which1].enabled)
 	    S9xRemoveCheat (which1);
 
+	// memmove required: Overlapping addresses [Neb]
 	memmove (&Cheat.c [which1], &Cheat.c [which1 + 1],
 		 sizeof (Cheat.c [0]) * (Cheat.num_cheats - which1 - 1));
 	Cheat.num_cheats--; //MK: This used to set it to 0??
-- 
cgit v1.2.3