1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdparty/des-4.04b/times/usparc.cc b/3rdparty/des-4.04b/times/usparc.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f6ec8e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdparty/des-4.04b/times/usparc.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
+
+For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
+gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
+I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
+is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES
+routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher
+speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
+'des_enc.c'.
+
+[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
+  '-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
+  and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
+  actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
+  using the libraries. ]
+
+options    des ecb/s
+16 r1 p    475516.90 100.0%
+16 r2 p    439388.10  92.4%
+16  c i    427001.40  89.8%
+16  c p    419516.50  88.2%
+ 4 r2 p    409491.70  86.1%
+ 4 r1 p    404266.90  85.0%
+ 4  c p    398121.00  83.7%
+ 4  c i    370588.40  77.9%
+ 4 r1 i    362742.20  76.3%
+16 r2 i    331275.50  69.7%
+16 r1 i    324730.60  68.3%
+ 4 r2 i     63535.10  13.4%	<-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
+-DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR
+