TITANIC: Better naming for Viewport function

I differentiated getRelativePosCentering() and
getRelativePosCentering2() since one was using
the raw Pose and one was using the regular Pose.

3 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/engines/titanic/star_control/star_camera.cpp b/engines/titanic/star_control/star_camera.cpp
index cab29a99f4..4edc05bbf7 100644
--- a/engines/titanic/star_control/star_camera.cpp
+++ b/engines/titanic/star_control/star_camera.cpp
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ FVector CStarCamera::proc30(int index, const FVector &v) {
 }
 
 FVector CStarCamera::proc31(int index, const FVector &v) {
-	return _viewport.getRelativePosCentering2(index, v);
+	return _viewport.getRelativePosCenteringRaw(index, v);
 }
 
 void CStarCamera::setViewportAngle(const FPoint &angles) {
diff --git a/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.cpp b/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.cpp
index d277f4a2c5..07a6dcc36c 100644
--- a/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.cpp
+++ b/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.cpp
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ FVector CViewport::getRelativePosCentering(int index, const FVector &src) {
 }
 
 // TODO: Identical to getRelativePosCentering, was this meant to be different?
-FVector CViewport::getRelativePosCentering2(int index, const FVector &src) {
+FVector CViewport::getRelativePosCenteringRaw(int index, const FVector &src) {
 	FVector dest;
 	FPose pose = getRawPose();
 	FVector tv = src.matProdRowVect(pose);
diff --git a/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.h b/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.h
index d5c35b6317..082d063233 100644
--- a/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.h
+++ b/engines/titanic/star_control/viewport.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ public:
 	FPose getRawPose();
 	FVector getRelativePosNoCentering(int index, const FVector &src);
 	FVector getRelativePosCentering(int index, const FVector &src);
-	FVector getRelativePosCentering2(int index, const FVector &src);
+	FVector getRelativePosCenteringRaw(int index, const FVector &src);
 
 	/**
 	 * All arguments are return values