aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--engines/sci/graphics/celobj32.cpp59
-rw-r--r--engines/sci/graphics/screen_item32.cpp71
2 files changed, 97 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/engines/sci/graphics/celobj32.cpp b/engines/sci/graphics/celobj32.cpp
index befa5cda18..f8cd5fd171 100644
--- a/engines/sci/graphics/celobj32.cpp
+++ b/engines/sci/graphics/celobj32.cpp
@@ -176,34 +176,61 @@ struct SCALER_Scale {
// line of source data when scaling
_reader(celObj, celObj._width) {
// In order for scaling ratios to apply equally across objects that
- // start at different positions on the screen, the pixels that are
- // read from the source bitmap must all use the same pattern of
- // division. In other words, cels must follow the same scaling pattern
- // as if they were drawn starting at an even multiple of the scaling
- // ratio, even if they were not.
+ // start at different positions on the screen (like the cels of a
+ // picture), the pixels that are read from the source bitmap must all
+ // use the same pattern of division. In other words, cels must follow
+ // a global scaling pattern as if they were always drawn starting at an
+ // even multiple of the scaling ratio, even if they are not.
//
// To get the correct source pixel when reading out through the scaler,
// the engine creates a lookup table for each axis that translates
// directly from target positions to the indexes of source pixels using
// the global cadence for the given scaling ratio.
+ //
+ // Note, however, that not all games use the global scaling mode.
+ //
+ // SQ6 definitely uses the global scaling mode (an easy visual
+ // comparison is to leave Implants N' Stuff and then look at Roger);
+ // Torin definitely does not (scaling subtitle backgrounds will cause it
+ // to attempt a read out of bounds and crash). They are both SCI
+ // "2.1mid" games, so currently the common denominator looks to be that
+ // games which use global scaling are the ones that use low-resolution
+ // script coordinates too.
const CelScalerTable *table = CelObj::_scaler->getScalerTable(scaleX, scaleY);
- const int16 unscaledX = (scaledPosition.x / scaleX).toInt();
- if (FLIP) {
- int lastIndex = celObj._width - 1;
- for (int16 x = targetRect.left; x < targetRect.right; ++x) {
- _valuesX[x] = lastIndex - (table->valuesX[x] - unscaledX);
+ if (g_sci->_gfxFrameout->getCurrentBuffer().scriptWidth == kLowResX) {
+ const int16 unscaledX = (scaledPosition.x / scaleX).toInt();
+ if (FLIP) {
+ int lastIndex = celObj._width - 1;
+ for (int16 x = targetRect.left; x < targetRect.right; ++x) {
+ _valuesX[x] = lastIndex - (table->valuesX[x] - unscaledX);
+ }
+ } else {
+ for (int16 x = targetRect.left; x < targetRect.right; ++x) {
+ _valuesX[x] = table->valuesX[x] - unscaledX;
+ }
+ }
+
+ const int16 unscaledY = (scaledPosition.y / scaleY).toInt();
+ for (int16 y = targetRect.top; y < targetRect.bottom; ++y) {
+ _valuesY[y] = table->valuesY[y] - unscaledY;
}
} else {
- for (int16 x = targetRect.left; x < targetRect.right; ++x) {
- _valuesX[x] = table->valuesX[x] - unscaledX;
+ if (FLIP) {
+ int lastIndex = celObj._width - 1;
+ for (int16 x = 0; x < targetRect.width(); ++x) {
+ _valuesX[targetRect.left + x] = lastIndex - table->valuesX[x];
+ }
+ } else {
+ for (int16 x = 0; x < targetRect.width(); ++x) {
+ _valuesX[targetRect.left + x] = table->valuesX[x];
+ }
}
- }
- const int16 unscaledY = (scaledPosition.y / scaleY).toInt();
- for (int16 y = targetRect.top; y < targetRect.bottom; ++y) {
- _valuesY[y] = table->valuesY[y] - unscaledY;
+ for (int16 y = 0; y < targetRect.height(); ++y) {
+ _valuesY[targetRect.top + y] = table->valuesY[y];
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/engines/sci/graphics/screen_item32.cpp b/engines/sci/graphics/screen_item32.cpp
index c1644a5ea3..ebaf132890 100644
--- a/engines/sci/graphics/screen_item32.cpp
+++ b/engines/sci/graphics/screen_item32.cpp
@@ -296,7 +296,30 @@ void ScreenItem::calcRects(const Plane &plane) {
}
if (!scaleX.isOne() || !scaleY.isOne()) {
- mulinc(_screenItemRect, scaleX, scaleY);
+ // Different games use a different cel scaling mode, but the
+ // difference isn't consistent across SCI versions; instead,
+ // it seems to be related to an update that happened during
+ // SCI2.1mid where games started using hi-resolution game
+ // scripts
+ if (scriptWidth == kLowResX) {
+ mulinc(_screenItemRect, scaleX, scaleY);
+ } else {
+ _screenItemRect.left = (_screenItemRect.left * scaleX).toInt();
+ _screenItemRect.top = (_screenItemRect.top * scaleY).toInt();
+
+ if (scaleX.getNumerator() > scaleX.getDenominator()) {
+ _screenItemRect.right = (_screenItemRect.right * scaleX).toInt();
+ } else {
+ _screenItemRect.right = ((_screenItemRect.right - 1) * scaleX).toInt() + 1;
+ }
+
+ if (scaleY.getNumerator() > scaleY.getDenominator()) {
+ _screenItemRect.bottom = (_screenItemRect.bottom * scaleY).toInt();
+ } else {
+ _screenItemRect.bottom = ((_screenItemRect.bottom - 1) * scaleY).toInt() + 1;
+ }
+ }
+
displaceX = (displaceX * scaleX).toInt();
displaceY = (displaceY * scaleY).toInt();
}
@@ -538,8 +561,6 @@ void ScreenItem::update() {
_celObj = nullptr;
}
-// TODO: This code is quite similar to calcRects, so try to deduplicate
-// if possible
Common::Rect ScreenItem::getNowSeenRect(const Plane &plane) const {
CelObj &celObj = getCelObj();
@@ -547,10 +568,7 @@ Common::Rect ScreenItem::getNowSeenRect(const Plane &plane) const {
Common::Rect nsRect;
if (_useInsetRect) {
- // TODO: This is weird. Checking to see if the inset rect is
- // fully inside the bounds of the celObjRect, and then
- // clipping to the celObjRect, is pretty useless.
- if (_insetRect.right > 0 && _insetRect.bottom > 0 && _insetRect.left < celObj._width && _insetRect.top < celObj._height) {
+ if (_insetRect.intersects(celObjRect)) {
nsRect = _insetRect;
nsRect.clip(celObjRect);
} else {
@@ -594,10 +612,7 @@ Common::Rect ScreenItem::getNowSeenRect(const Plane &plane) const {
Ratio scriptToCelY(celObj._scaledHeight, scriptHeight);
mulru(nsRect, scriptToCelX, scriptToCelY, 0);
- // TODO: This is weird. Checking to see if the inset rect is
- // fully inside the bounds of the celObjRect, and then
- // clipping to the celObjRect, is pretty useless.
- if (nsRect.right > 0 && nsRect.bottom > 0 && nsRect.left < celObj._width && nsRect.top < celObj._height) {
+ if (nsRect.intersects(celObjRect)) {
nsRect.clip(celObjRect);
} else {
nsRect = Common::Rect();
@@ -605,12 +620,34 @@ Common::Rect ScreenItem::getNowSeenRect(const Plane &plane) const {
}
if (!scaleX.isOne() || !scaleY.isOne()) {
- mulinc(nsRect, scaleX, scaleY);
- // TODO: This was in the original code, baked into the
- // multiplication though it is not immediately clear
- // why this is the only one that reduces the BR corner
- nsRect.right -= 1;
- nsRect.bottom -= 1;
+ // Different games use a different cel scaling mode, but the
+ // difference isn't consistent across SCI versions; instead,
+ // it seems to be related to an update that happened during
+ // SCI2.1mid where games started using hi-resolution game
+ // scripts
+ if (scriptWidth == kLowResX) {
+ mulinc(nsRect, scaleX, scaleY);
+ // TODO: This was in the original code, baked into the
+ // multiplication though it is not immediately clear
+ // why this is the only one that reduces the BR corner
+ nsRect.right -= 1;
+ nsRect.bottom -= 1;
+ } else {
+ nsRect.left = (nsRect.left * scaleX).toInt();
+ nsRect.top = (nsRect.top * scaleY).toInt();
+
+ if (scaleX.getNumerator() > scaleX.getDenominator()) {
+ nsRect.right = (nsRect.right * scaleX).toInt();
+ } else {
+ nsRect.right = ((nsRect.right - 1) * scaleX).toInt() + 1;
+ }
+
+ if (scaleY.getNumerator() > scaleY.getDenominator()) {
+ nsRect.bottom = (nsRect.bottom * scaleY).toInt();
+ } else {
+ nsRect.bottom = ((nsRect.bottom - 1) * scaleY).toInt() + 1;
+ }
+ }
}
Ratio celToScriptX(scriptWidth, celObj._scaledWidth);
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-12-01 01:05:41 +0000