| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 20d5a67f8b71c668ca304b85c1d8b91759922031.
|
|
Saving/loading already handles savegame creation/play time, the
information just wasn't displayed until now because the MetaEngine
features weren't being reported as supported which I assume to be
an oversight.
Fixes Trac#10006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit introduces the following changes:
1. Graphics::loadThumbnail()
Now returns a boolean and takes a new argument skipThumbnail which
defaults to false. In case of true, loadThumbnail() reads past the
thumbnail data in the input stream instead of actually loading the
thumbnail. This simplifies savegame handling where, up until now,
many engines always read the whole savegame metadata (including
the thumbnail) and then threw away the thumbnail when not needed
(which is in almost all cases, the most common exception being
MetaEngine::querySaveMetaInfos() which is responsible for loading
savegame metadata for displaying it in the GUI launcher.
2. readSavegameHeader()
Engines which already implement such a method (name varies) now take
a new argument skipThumbnail (default: true) which is passed
through to loadThumbnail(). This means that the default case for
readSavegameHeader() is now _not_ loading the thumbnail from a
savegame and just reading past it. In those cases, e.g.
querySaveMetaInfos(), where we actually are interested in loading
the thumbnail readSavegameHeader() needs to explicitely be called
with skipThumbnail == false.
Engines whose readSavegameHeader() (name varies) already takes an
argument loadThumbnail have been adapted to have a similar
prototype and semantics.
I.e. readSaveHeader(in, loadThumbnail, header) now is
readSaveHeader(in, header, skipThumbnail).
3. Error handling
Engines which previously did not check the return value of
readSavegameHeader() (name varies) now do so ensuring that possibly
broken savegames (be it a broken thumbnail or something else) don't
make it into the GUI launcher list in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This flag is removed for a few reasons:
* Engines universally set this flag to true for widths > 320,
which made it redundant everywhere;
* This flag functioned primarily as a "force 1x scaler" flag,
since its behaviour was almost completely undocumented and users
would need to figure out that they'd need an explicit non-default
scaler set to get a scaler to operate at widths > 320;
* (Most importantly) engines should not be in the business of
deciding how the backend may choose to render its virtual screen.
The choice of rendering behaviour belongs to the user, and the
backend, in that order.
A nearby future commit restores the default1x scaler behaviour in
the SDL backend code for the moment, but in the future it is my
hope that there will be a better configuration UI to allow users
to specify how they want scaling to work for high resolutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added it into hasFeature() of all engines which returned `true` in
simpleSaveNames() before.
As mentioned in #788, SCI is not always using simple names, so it
doesn't have such feature now.
|
|
Engines with "simple" savenames would support "Run in background" in
save/load dialog and gradual save slots unlocking. Other engines
save/load feature would be locked until save sync is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without this change the Apple gcc 4.0 compiler (the last version to
support the MacOS X 10.4 SDK) generate a lot of errors regarding
trying to initialise references to Sherlock::Scalpel::Talk with the
address to a Sherlock::Talk object, or about forward declarations of Sherlock::Scalpel::Talk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since 'w' and 'h' are members of ManagedSurface, using them as
input parameters to a method caused GCC to warn about them being
shadowed. For just about every file in the Sherlock engine...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently we started to use this as new semantics, although in the past
we used simly <engine>_H. Now these guard defines are consistent with
rest of the files which are used in the engines.
|
|
|
|
from execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I can tell, the lines I removed to draw the search box
are already handled by the call to makeField() above. Also, they
were drawing to the wrong surface, and one of them was in the
wrong direction, which is what triggered an assertion.
|
|
Thanks to LordHoto for noticing.
|
